MISSOURI S AND T ITHENTICATE LOGIN SOFTWARE

There may be some manuscripts with an overall low similarity percentage, but a higher percentage from a single source. It is important to mention that the text taken from different sources with an overall low similarity percentage will be considered as a plagiarized content if the majority of the article is a combination of copied material. If the similarity level is above 5%, the manuscript is returned to the author for paraphrasing the text and citing the original source of the copied material. The acceptable limit for similarity of text from a single source is 5%. The Content Tracking mode ensures that manuscripts with an overall low percentage similarity (but may have a higher similarity from a single source) are not overlooked.

The text of every submitted manuscript is checked using the Content Tracking mode in iThenticate. The similarity percentage is further checked keeping the following important points in view Low Text Similarity Bentham Science allows an overall similarity of 20% for a manuscript to be considered for publication. Any instance of content overlap is further scrutinized for suspected plagiarism according to the publisher s Editorial Policies. It generates a similarity report, highlighting the percentage of overlap between the uploaded article and the published material.

iThenticate software checks content against a database of periodicals, the Internet, and a comprehensive article database. Plagiarism PreventionД«entham Science uses the iThenticate software to detect instances of overlapping and similar text in submitted manuscripts. Authors must list the source(s) of funding for the study. Complaints to the Publisher may be emailed to Conflict of InterestДЇinancial contributions and any potential conflict of interest must be clearly acknowledged under the heading вЂConflict of InterestвЂ™. Acceptance of the manuscript is not guaranteed even if the journal agrees to reconsider the manuscript, and the reconsideration process may involve previous or new reviewers or editors and substantive revision.ДЄuthors who wish to make a complaint should refer them to the Editor-in-Chief of the journal concerned. The EIC and other relevant editors will consider the appeal and the decision thereafter taken by the journal will be deemed final. A difference of opinion as to the interest, novelty, or suitability of the manuscript for the journal will not be considered as an appeal.

Appeals must give sound reasoning and compelling evidence against the criticism raised in the rejection letter. However, authors who think that their manuscript was rejected due to a misunderstanding or mistake may seek an explanation for the decision. Generally, the editorial decisions are not reverted. Furthermore, any illustration, structure or table that has been published elsewhere must be reported, and copyright permission for reproduction must be obtained. The author(s) will confirm that the manuscript (or any part of it) has not been published previously or is not under consideration for publication elsewhere. The principal/corresponding author will be required to submit a Copyright Letter along with the manuscript, on behalf of all the co-authors (if any). Copyright LetterДЄrticles must be submitted by one of the authors of the manuscript, and should not be submitted by anyone on their behalf. High-quality, bound/unbound, print/e-prints can be purchased for all published articles. Articles submitted are copyedited before they are published. Copyediting and ProofsДЄrticles must be written in good English in a clear and correct style in order to maintain uniformity throughout the text. Submissions from the Editor-in-Chief / Co-Editor/ Editorial Board Members will undergo independent peer-review and will be submitted to another Editor for his decision on acceptance. All manuscripts/chapters are assessed rapidly and the decision based on all the peer reviewers' comments, taken by the journalвЂ™s Editor-in-Chief, is then conveyed to the author(s). Peer ReviewД«entham Science Publishers follows the single blind peer-review procedure for submissions of all manuscripts to its journals, except for a selected number of patent journals where double blind review is followed.ДЄll submitted articles are subjected to an extensive peer review in consultation with members of the journal s editorial board and independent external referees (usually three reviewers).

Fabricating and Stating False InformationДЇor journals, the following publication policies are applied by Bentham Science.

Technology Transfer and Entrepreneurship.

MISSOURI S AND T ITHENTICATE LOGIN SOFTWARE

Missouri s and t ithenticate login